The ‘indie’ explosion – a missed opportunity?

Posted on 28 September 2010 by editor, 11 . Tags: , , ,

About 3-4 years ago, the devastating 1-2-3 punch of a TV series called “Kami”, its mega-hit theme song “Lagu Untukmu” by Meet Uncle Hussein, and the meteoric rise of Hujan made ‘indie’ an overnight buzzword on everyone’s lips. While there’s no shortage of people annoyed with such a cheap usage of the word ‘indie’ then, there’s also no denying what a shot in the arm that word’s new buzzword status was to our perpetually fledgling independent music scene.

Gigs suddenly became well attended events, and kids in general (in unbelievable numbers!) made genuine attempts to get to know and discover new independent music. There were even genuine mainstream stars that came out of the whole indie explosion.

Almost 4 years later, even though most of the name indie acts are still doing quite well for themselves (mostly in the mainstream), the independent scene has seemingly gone back to its old fledgling status, with sparsely attended gigs back to being a very normal occurrence, and people paying no attention to us once more. What happened?

Different people of course have different theories on why this has been the case. But to me, it’s just been the simple case of the excitement missing from most of these gigs. There’s always been indie bands putting on and playing shows before the explosion, with similarly lukewarm responses. So why did the scene suddenly explode then?

It exploded because suddenly there were a handful of bands that a lot of people are willing to pay money to go and see live onstage. Like it or not, there were now ‘indie’ stars, bands with songs that people love enough to go crazy about. And no, it’s not just a Malaysian thing, it’s been the norm the world over. The Shins, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, Arcade Fire, Vampire Weekend and now The Black Keys are all prime examples of indie bands who became stars while still remaining relatively small and independent compared to the mainstream.

What’s been missing from the small gigs nowadays are exactly the kind marquee names that’s been bringing in the hordes of sweaty bodies to these gigs in the first place during the beginning and up to the peak of the explosion back then. What’s basically happened is that these marquee names have simply become too successful in the mainstream that they’ve simply priced themselves out of the small gigs now. And here is where we argue that it doesn’t have to be like that at all.

As artists who make a living doing music full time, it is totally understandable that they’d want to be paid what they’re worth. But it should also be fairly logical to look at things subjectively as well. Corporate bodies and sponsored events can surely pay an arm and a leg (and maybe even more), but to expect a gig organiser to be able to afford to do so as well is clearly unrealistic, no? Surely a middle ground can be reached in terms of payment wherein the bands won’t feel exploited (by being paid an amount not commensurate to the amount of people expected to pay to come and see them) and that the promoters will also feel that they’ll be paying a fair amount that’ll put them in with a realistic chance of at least recouping their costs.

As it is with everything indie, a fair amount of trust has to be put in to make things work, and a whole lot of compromise as well. This is after all still a labour of love on most people’s part. While we may have lost quite a bit of ground in the past few months, there’s always room to make up for it. We need to feel the excitement again. Money, after all, is just a bonus, right?

Written by Aidil Rusli


Tags: , , ,
Category: Articles
 


  • http://pasakarat.posterous.com afzam adenan

    Tommy’s model of profit-sharing can be the answer. However, without transparency, it’s just not possible.

  • bin

    The Dance-Punk, as well as the indie-electro scene are becoming growing concerns.

    Just check out http://www.dancepunkparty.com to see the upsurge of interest in bands that are influenced by Nu-Rave,Dance-Punk and sound of the 80′s. Financed, curated and organized solely by Jarrod Sio, it is indubitably a DIY affair.

    On the Indie-Electro front, a myriad of very well attended (numbering in thousands!) DIY events are organized frequently. Events like electro collective WE ARE MUTANTS’ month zombie nights rival Ed Bangers Records and Dim Mak’s parties in terms of attendance, hipness and quality of deejays featured.

    So, you see, all is not lost. Trends are like the meeting point of a double-helix – when one trend is on priming for a descent, another would be on the ascent. The indie scene, as it stands, is the former.

    cheers

  • tendang

    DIY is the only way to go. Gotta learn from the hardcore / punk DIY kids.

  • Danial

    Much respect to the hardcore scene here. Have been keeping that same low-profile & didn’t jump the gun when the scene boom happened. And they still keep bringing in international acts on a monthly basis. DIY ethic ftw.

  • tommy

    @Tareh > Picadilly days are Picadilly days. It’s the times lah. In the early 90s, up to the end of it, “alternative music” was the rage and like every other trend, its hot while it’s hot, and then it died.

    And when it’s not seen as “cool” anymore to be seen prancing there, a large chunk of people who were there, whether directly involved or supportive spectators, they bailed out.

    So what you got now are mostly people who love it, no matter what, and of course, without the trend factor, the hanger-ons who made up the numbers back then are now gone. That’s how it is.

    So get on with the programme lah. And the reality here is that they are less people going to gigs with higher cost to put them up. In short there’s no money in it anymore. So what you gonna do?

    Do it yourselves. Do it with your friends. Be transparent, be trustworthy. The businessmen don’t want to be transparent, so don’t work with them lah. SImple. Kick them out. This is your scene right? Why do you need profiteering outsiders fleecing your talent?

    Basically, there’s no use whining. Get together and do it yourselves. apa tunggu?

  • http://tareh.tumblr.com tareh

    aidil,

    this is easy. just make kids wanna play music again. remember picadilly, jump, fire? remember ages back, for the love of music and rocking out – we dont give a rat ass what’s or who is playing but still everyone comes in droves and rock the pit. these days everyone is malas, distracted dengan internet and who/what-is-cool. dulu its a normal occurance to see guys with their gitar kapok main kat padang or depan rumah. these days its psp. damn.

  • darnia

    “Gig organisers & organisers most times put their own $$ into events just to make it happen”

    Heard this one before (many many times). Bands put in their own money too.

  • http://www.doppelgangerkl.blogspot.com Jaz

    Gig organisers & organisers most times put their own $$ into events just to make it happen. Corporate sponsors help push the scene but when they plonk money into a show, it’s for a reason – sales, marketing, branding. Not for the love of the scene. Bands need to remember that. It’s a symbiosis though. No sponsor, no big stage. No bands, no gig. No crowd, no venue. No venue, no organiser. No organiser, no gig. Hahahaha. Most organisers these days were bands anyway. So most organisers I know are fair. Some are too ambitious. They die. It’s just a nice way of evolving. Just use your head and be fair. Then everyone’s happy. That’s our philosophy anyways.

  • http://www.ngijna.com ngijna

    @tommy > Trust is important in any business, but transparency is a no go. Most businesses keep their cards close to their chests for a reason.

    @FBM > Gig organizers will ALWAYS do this. It’s business. Lower your costs mah.

    For bands on the other hand, they (or their managers) should find out all the costings involved in organizing a show- ticket price, sponsors (if any), location. And base your ‘fees’ on these points. Treat your band as though its a business too – if you can’t, ask your manager to do it.

    And of course, always educate yourself.

  • tommy

    Why don’t you guys in these bands share the profits instead of asking for a set amount of payment?

    All the promoter needs to do is be transparent with all the costing and the door takings.

    Lets say the show cost RM1000. Take out RM1000 from the door takings and share the rest (profit) – divide the pie using percentages. If there were 4 bands, for an example, promoter gets 20%, 80% shared by the bands.

    this way, all the responsibilities in promoting the show fall upon all partners, the same goes with the risks.

    What’s needed is TRUST & TRANSPARENCY. But of course, these days, they are both hard to come by.

  • Frustrated Band Member

    Gig organisers usually expect bands to play out of their love for the music and not pay us anything. When we refuse, they’d brand us as “band macam bagus”

    What a buncha bullshit.

The Wknd Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter for more updates, discounts and free stuff

Twitter: @thewknd

Our Facebook

Soundcloud Dropbox

Send me your sounds

Popular Posts